Deciding where a workload belongs
A practical placement framework covering licensing, latency, regulation, resilience requirements and total cost across cloud, hosting and on premises.
Read moreLicensing terms, latency, regulatory constraints, specialized hardware or plain economics mean certain systems are better hosted than migrated. We provide resilient managed hosting for those, connected properly to the cloud services running everything else.
Managed hosting services run your servers and applications in a professionally operated data center, with the provider handling power, cooling, connectivity, hardware, monitoring, patching and backup under a written service agreement. A secure managed hosting service adds controlled physical access, continuous monitoring, tested backups and documented evidence for audits. It suits workloads that should not move to public cloud: systems tied down by licensing, latency, specialized hardware, regulation or economics. Managed hosting differs from plain colocation, where you supply and maintain the hardware, and from public cloud, where you rent shared infrastructure. Good data center hosting also connects those workloads to Azure and Microsoft 365, so hosted and cloud systems behave as one environment. Our engineers also run Azure and Microsoft 365 estates, so hybrid issues have one owner.
Not every workload benefits from public cloud, and pretending otherwise gets expensive.
Single power feed, domestic air conditioning, no fire suppression and a rack in a room people walk through. The risk is understood and never quite funded.
Some vendor licensing models price cloud hosting punitively, so a straight migration increases cost substantially for no functional gain.
Plant-floor systems, imaging equipment, specialized peripherals and low-latency applications have physical constraints that a migration plan cannot argue away.
Capital approval is difficult, so equipment runs past warranty. Failure risk accumulates and eventually a decision gets made under pressure.
Hybrid is a legitimate destination, not a transitional embarrassment. The right question is which workload belongs where — and for a meaningful minority, the honest answer is not public cloud. The right question is which workload belongs where
Measured against the risk, cost and effort of running the equipment yourself.
Facility-level redundancy for power, cooling and connectivity, with availability commitments stated in the service agreement.
Hardware refresh, capacity and lifecycle absorbed into a predictable monthly cost rather than periodic capital approval battles.
RPO and RTO agreed in writing and demonstrated through scheduled failover testing with documented results.
Continuous monitoring with defined response targets, so hardware and environmental issues are handled before they become outages.
Lifecycle tracked and refresh planned in advance, removing the risk of production running on unsupported hardware.
Facility certifications, access logs and control evidence available for audits and client due diligence questionnaires.
How to read these: the figures above are typical ranges we plan and measure against, not guarantees. In your first engagement we agree the baseline, the target and the measurement method in writing, then report against them.
Full managed hosting services, colocation with support, or disaster recovery hosting alongside your own facility. Most engagements start with one of these and expand.
We host, monitor, patch, back up and maintain the workloads that need to stay off public cloud, with clear service commitments.
Disaster recovery designed around agreed objectives and proven through testing, not assumed from a diagram.
Hosted workloads connected properly to Azure, Microsoft 365 and your offices, with identity and security consistent across both.
Hosting is rarely bought alone. These are the elements clients combine.
Which workloads belong in public cloud, in managed hosting or on premises — assessed on licensing, latency, regulation, economics and support model.
Rack space, power, cooling and connectivity in a resilient facility, with hardware either provided by us or colocated by you.
Provisioning, patching, monitoring, capacity management and hardware lifecycle for hosted systems.
Backup design, replication, scheduled restore testing and documented failover runbooks aligned to agreed recovery objectives.
Connectivity between hosted workloads, Azure, Microsoft 365 and your sites, with consistent identity, DNS and security controls.
Physical and virtual migration with dependency mapping, cutover planning and rollback — including migration out, should you choose to leave.
Where an on-site server room must be vacated for a building move, lease end or risk reason: assessment, placement decisions, migration and decommissioning.
For healthcare, financial services, legal and public sector: data residency, access control evidence, facility certification and audit support.
Placement decisions first, because moving a workload twice is the expensive outcome.
Inventory of workloads, dependencies, licensing terms, performance requirements and current hosting arrangements.
Agree placement for each workload, plus recovery objectives and availability requirements that match business impact rather than habit.
Hosting architecture, connectivity, backup, recovery and monitoring designed against those agreed objectives.
Migration executed with testing, cutover runbooks and rollback, followed by service handover and documentation.
Capacity, cost and lifecycle reviewed periodically, with workloads re-evaluated for cloud as licensing and requirements change.
Placement is reviewed, not fixed. Licensing terms, product capability and business requirements change. We revisit workload placement periodically and will recommend moving to cloud when the economics genuinely shift.
WHO IT'S FOR
Where Microsoft technology fits into your hosting plan
Private, reliable connectivity between hosted systems, Azure and your offices.
One identity and conditional access model across hosted and cloud workloads.
Integration with email, collaboration and device management so hosted applications fit how people work.
Offsite backup and recovery options that complement hosted capacity.
One monitoring and security view across hosted servers and Azure.
How Windows Server, SQL Server and other licenses apply in hosted and cloud environments, so placement decisions rest on real cost.
Where public cloud or SaaS is the better answer for a workload, the placement report says so.
Why organizations choose us as their managed hosting company
The engineers who manage your hosted workloads also run your Azure and Microsoft 365 estate, so hybrid issues have one owner and no finger-pointing.
We host workloads that should be hosted. Where public cloud or SaaS is genuinely better, we will say so even though it reduces our hosting revenue.
Failover testing is scheduled and documented. You do not discover the state of your recovery plan during an incident.
Warranty, capacity and refresh are tracked and planned, so hardware decisions are made calmly rather than after a failure.
Imaging and clinical systems ran in a converted office with single power and domestic cooling. Placement analysis split the estate between hosting and cloud.
Production control systems required local latency. Hybrid hosting kept them resilient while corporate workloads moved to cloud.
Demo content: the organizations and measurements above are illustrative placeholders written to show the structure of a real story. Replace them with verified client results and approved references before publishing.
Material for teams deciding where each workload belongs.
A practical placement framework covering licensing, latency, regulation, resilience requirements and total cost across cloud, hosting and on premises.
Read moreWhy an untested recovery plan is a document rather than a control, and what a credible annual test schedule looks like.
Read moreDependencies, licensing, connectivity, cutover windows, decommissioning and disposal — what to confirm before vacating a facility.
Read moreA placement assessment gives you a workload-by-workload recommendation with the cost, risk and licensing implications of each option.
Managed hosting services run your servers and applications in a professional data center, with the provider responsible for power, cooling, connectivity, hardware, monitoring, patching and backup under a written service agreement. You keep control of the workloads while the provider handles the infrastructure.
Data center hosting means your servers and applications run in a purpose-built facility with redundant power, cooling, connectivity and physical security, instead of in an office server room. It can be colocation, where you own the hardware, or managed hosting, where the provider also runs and maintains it.
Look for redundant power, cooling and connectivity, controlled and logged physical access, patching and monitoring that run continuously, encrypted backups with tested restores, and documented evidence you can hand to auditors. Ask any provider to show the evidence, not just describe it.
Ask five things. Where is the facility and what certifications does it hold? What availability is written into the service agreement? Have they tested failover, and can you see the results? Who supports hybrid connections to Azure and Microsoft 365? Will they tell you when a workload belongs in public cloud instead?
Colocation gives you space, power and connectivity while you own and maintain the hardware. Managed hosting adds hardware, monitoring, patching and backup run for you. Public cloud rents shared infrastructure by usage. The right choice depends on licensing, latency, regulation and cost for each workload.
Typically systems with punitive cloud licensing, plant-floor or imaging systems with latency or hardware constraints, and workloads with specific regulatory requirements. A placement assessment tests each against licensing, latency, regulation, economics and support model.
Disaster recovery hosting keeps a replicated copy of your critical systems ready to take over if the primary fails. We agree recovery point and recovery time objectives in writing, design replication and backup to meet them, then test failover on a schedule and document the results. You see the test results, not an architecture diagram.
Yes. This is hybrid cloud hosting. We connect hosted workloads to Azure and Microsoft 365 with site-to-site VPN or Express Route, and integrate DNS and identity so security and monitoring are consistent across both.
It depends on the number of servers, storage, bandwidth, recovery requirements and support level. We don't quote from a price list. After a 30-minute call we send a written recommendation with clear scope, timeline and a fixed price.
Yes. Migration out of hosting is part of what we scope, with dependency mapping, cutover planning and rollback, and we recommend moving workloads to cloud when the economics genuinely shift.
Yes. A server room exit program covers assessment, placement decisions for each workload, migration and decommissioning, so a building move, lease end or risk concern doesn't turn into an outage.
Workloads running in a resilient, monitored facility under clear service commitments, recovery objectives that have been tested, a lifecycle and refresh plan, and documented evidence for audits and client questionnaires.
Describe the situation in your own words.