Dynamics 365
The Microsoft business application platform, adopted as a connected suite rather than as separate products.
A college access and scholarship nonprofit, United States. Student and donor data was managed manually, limiting how many students the organization could support and how well it could demonstrate outcomes to funders.
Student and donor data was managed manually, limiting how many students the organization could support and how well it could demonstrate outcomes to funders.
Small nonprofits carry a disproportionate data burden: they must demonstrate outcomes to funders with the same rigour as a large organization, using a fraction of the staff.
Dynamics 365 was implemented through Microsoft's Nonprofit Tech Acceleration programme with a partner, streamlining data management and improving donor engagement.
The outcome figures — 96% on track to graduate, a 60% increase in full-ride scholarship offers — are programme results rather than system metrics, which is the right way for a nonprofit to report. The system's contribution was making the data manageable enough that the programme could scale.
These are the figures exactly as reported in the source. Nothing has been rounded, extrapolated or restated.
The Microsoft business application platform, adopted as a connected suite rather than as separate products.
Nonprofit-specific acceleration programmes are substantially under-claimed. Checking eligibility is a short conversation with a large potential return.
Where it usually gets harder than expected: Attributing programme outcomes to a system change is difficult and should be done carefully. The honest claim is that better data management enabled the programme work, not that the software produced the graduation rate.
We sit with the people doing the work and watch what actually happens, including every workaround. Process documents and reality are rarely the same thing.
We prototype and show you your own records in it, not a demo company, before anything is built.
By site, by practice group or by service line — with the group that wants it most going first, to a fixed price.
We report against the numbers agreed at the start, including where the result fell short of the target.
If any of the above describes your organization, tell us where it hurts most. We will tell you what the same platforms could realistically do in your environment, what we would measure, and whether we think it is worth doing at all.
Describe the situation in your own words.