Power Automate
Workflow and integration. Moves data between systems, routes approvals and removes the manual re-keying that rarely appears in anyone's job description.
A national acute care provider group, United States. Medical records arrived from a wide variety of providers in inconsistent formats and had to be assembled into a coherent history for each patient, for both care and billing. Volume growth meant hiring.
Medical records arrived from a wide variety of providers in inconsistent formats and had to be assembled into a coherent history for each patient, for both care and billing. Volume growth meant hiring.
Records processing is the sort of work that never appears on a strategy slide and quietly consumes a department. Medical records arrive from hundreds of providers in formats that were never standardised, and someone has to turn them into one coherent history before either a clinician or a biller can use them.
The DevOps team automated intake and processing with Power Automate, taking records from every source and normalising them into one patient history without manual handling.
The scale here is what makes it notable: twenty million records a year is well past the point where adding staff is a viable answer, and the organization was facing exactly that decision. Automating the intake and normalisation with workflow tooling rather than a bespoke integration platform kept the solution inside the existing licensing and skill set.
These are the figures exactly as reported in the source. Nothing has been rounded, extrapolated or restated.
Workflow and integration. Moves data between systems, routes approvals and removes the manual re-keying that rarely appears in anyone's job description.
Any organization ingesting high volumes of unstructured documents from many external parties — claims, applications, invoices, referrals — has a version of this problem and usually has not measured what it costs.
Where it usually gets harder than expected: Automation at this volume makes exception handling the whole job. The design question is not what happens to the 95% that process cleanly, but who looks at the rest and how quickly they find them.
Most organizations are licensed for more than they have deployed. This step frequently reduces the engagement we were about to be paid for.
Copilot reaches whatever the user can reach. A decade of casual oversharing becomes visible on day one, and it is entirely avoidable if you look first.
The functions that will use it know where their week goes. Scenario selection done inside IT produces pilots that impress nobody.
Usage, then time and quality, then business KPIs. Anyone promising the third before the first exists is guessing.
If any of the above describes your organization, tell us where it hurts most. We will tell you what the same platforms could realistically do in your environment, what we would measure, and whether we think it is worth doing at all.
Describe the situation in your own words.